Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Laurendine v. Markham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 1982No. MM-396Published

1Concurrence

MILLS, Judge,

specially concurring:

I agree with the majority’s result and would affirm but not for the reason stated by the majority.

In 1947, W. H. Markham employed Fu-gate, a surveyor, to divide an east one-half section of land into four equal portions. Subsequently, Markham placed each of his four sons in possession of one of the parcels. Vernon Markham occupied the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter of the section. Howard Markham occupied the south one-half of the northeast one-quarter. Fences were set along the lines established by the Fugate survey. Title to each portion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hester v. GatlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Williams v. JohntryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Acosta v. GinglesSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  4. Watson v. GodwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API