Legal Opinion

Glassman v. Goldman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Wither, J.

Third-party defendants have moved for an order dismissing the third-party complaint herein on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a *430cause of action. In the original complaint plaintiff alleges that defendants were negligent in that defendant Bernice Goldman operated the automobile of defendant third-party plaintiff, Haskel Goldman, with his permission, that she stopped the car on a grade in a public parking area, got out leaving the motor running “ without setting the brake thereon and without taking other steps or precautions under the conditions there existing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Garvin v. GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Traub v. DinzlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Cloud v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  5. Sorrentino v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foy v. Ed Taussig, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. v. BoydIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API