Legal Opinion
Seiler v. Geier
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
This action seeks to compel the defendant to perform specifically a written agreement, dated May 12, 1947, which he alone signed. By its terms, he agreed to sell to the plaintiffs a straight ten-year lease commencing on January 1, 1947, which he owned on a certain theatre, the name and location of which are set forth in said writing. In said writing, defendant acknowledged receipt from these plaintiffs of “ the sum of $1,000. in cash, which is to be applied by me on account of the sale by me of the lease and good will of the New Ozone Theatre ”.
The answer admits the existence of the lease,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pettibone v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Coutts v. J. L. Kraft & Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1922
- Coutts v. J. L. Kraft & Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Fox v. HawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mangus v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Rizzo v. Stamp Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Trustees of Columbia University v. Mortgagee Investors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949