Legal Opinion

Kleeman v. Fogerson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1964No. 7492PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

From the action of the trial court in dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and granting judgment on defendants’ counterclaim, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover the reasonable value of grazing twenty-three head of cattle on the plaintiff’s pasture land. The defendants answered and also counterclaimed for an alleged breach of contract, by reason of a claimed violation of the covenants in a lease agreement entered into between the parties, viz., failure to maintain boundary fences and adequate water supply for the use of cattle on the premises. The lease, or a copy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gary v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Ruud v. American Packing & Provision Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. KroutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Southern Coast Corporation v. Sinclair Refining CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Watson v. Cannon Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gray v. J. P. (Bum) Gibbins, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Dunson Contractors, Inc. v. KouryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Schnoor v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API