Legal Opinion

Rope v. Wagner

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1886Published

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The appellant is a married woman. She was conducting a separate business, and in the course of it bought sash and blinds of one William Hall. The business was conducted by the appellant’s husband, and his power of attorney, verbal and written, is abundantly proven. The appellant was present when the note was given, which was given, it appears, in the usual way, and signed in the husband’s name, E. J. Van Wagner, with the addition of the abbreviation “att’y.” Hall’s representative spoke to the appellant, who was present, to put her name on the note. “She asked me what for; said that was her…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. HarveyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Sheldon v. HortonNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Sheldon v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API