Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Marine

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 5, 1968No. 20,593Published

1DissentQuinn, Chief Judge

The challenged instructions do not authorize punishment in excess of that allowed by law, either directly or indirectly. They expressly limit the punishment for the several acts to the legal maximum for a single offense. To that extent they are unimpeachable. The narrow question then is whether it is illegal to allow the court members to consider, as an aggravating circumstance, the fact that the accused’s offense was composed of several misdeeds. Multiple acts of misconduct committed over a period of time may be charged as a single offense. See United States v Aloyian, 16 USCMA 333, 36 CMR…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. AloyianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. HelfrickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. ZilkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API