Legal Opinion

Petrosky v. Danovitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1925No. Appeals, 222 and 223PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

These appeals are from judgments on verdicts for husband and wife for damages resulting from a collision by defendant’s motor truck and plaintiff’s wagon. The wagon was standing by the curb on Main Street in Sharpsburg and as Jane Petrosky, one of plaintiffs, was alighting from the wagon, the motor truck crashed into the rear end of the wagon and injured her. As the only point presented here is the refusal to enter judgment for the defendant n. o. v., ive must take the evidence most favorably supporting the verdicts. The distance between the curb and the nearest car track…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lanning v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Rankin v. Ward Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Reisinger v. McConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Zercher v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. McFeeters v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valanda v. Baum & Reissman, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API