Legal Opinion
Dinio v. Olivar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 12, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated July 2, 1998, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment which were to dismiss the causes of action alleging breach of contract, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing, among other causes of action, the cause of action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Doherty v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fiammetta v. St. Francis HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cunningham v. MertzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McGimpsey v. J. Robert Folchetti & Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cunningham v. MertzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999