Legal Opinion

Haik v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1930No. 697PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

The defendant company issued an insurance policy on a Peerless seven-passenger auto in favor of plaintiff. In May, 1928, during the term of the policy, the car, while being driven by the plaintiff, fell in a hole, and was damaged, requiring repairs to the sum of $227.35, which was paid by plaintiff, and was recovered against defendant in this suit.

The portion of the policy pertinent to the issue presented for decision provides for indemnity for loss or damage to the auto “caused solely by accidental collision with another object.”

Plaintiff left Covington, where he Vas living, with members of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Barnard v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Welch v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. City Coal & Supply Co. v. American Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API