Legal Opinion

Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. Brookfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.. Eor opinion of the Supreme Court see 39 Vroom 478.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The defendant in this action is a warehouseman. He conducts his business under the name of the “Central Storage Company.” On November 1st, 1901, one Ida Gordon stored with him a Wheeler & Wilson sewdng machine, taking a warehouse receipt therefor, pursuant to statute. Gen. Slat., p. 3746.

On November 30th, 1901, the plaintiff served a formal written demand upon the defendant for the delivery to it of the machine in question, as follows:

“Camden, N. J., Nov. 30, 1901.

'To Central Storage Go., 811 Newton Ave.:

“Demand is hereby made upon you that you…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Bliven Mead v. . Hudson River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Wells v. American Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Burton v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MaioniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Street v. Farmers' Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Street v. Farmers' Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Farmers' Union Warehouse Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API