Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1983No. 45167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant claims entitlement to an eviden-tiary hearing because his motion alleged he pleaded guilty to carrying a concealed weapon based upon threatened prosecution for arson, thereby rendering the guilty plea involuntary.

The transcript of the guilty plea proceeding conclusively repudiates movant’s contention, therefore obviating a need for an evidentiary hearing. Rule 27.26(j); Merritt v. State, 650 S.W.2d 21, 22 (Mo.App.1983).

The record of the guilty plea hearing demonstrates movant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merritt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Bonner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API