Legal Opinion

Palen v. Cullom Capital Woodworking, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 13, 1987No. 4-86-0562PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

The Livingston County circuit court granted summary judgment for the defendants, finding they could not be held liable for damages resulting from breach of a contract for deed once plaintiffs opted to declare the contract forfeited. We affirm.

On April 27, 1981, plaintiffs entered into a contract for deed with defendant Cullom Capital Woodworking, Inc. (Corporation). Pursuant to a contract provision, defendants Ivan Stoller and Phillip Thames, primary stockholders in the Corporation, personally guaranteed the Corporation’s performance of the contract. This guaranty appeared at the bottom of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bruno Benedetti & Sons, Inc. v. O'MalleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Beebe v. KirkpatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lawndale Steel Co. v. AppelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Holm v. JamiesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Kenneth Witte, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Frankel v. Otiswear, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Linnemann v. Post (Mission Bay Ski & Bike, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  4. Edens Plaza Bank v. DemosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Frankel v. Otiswear, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API