Legal Opinion

State v. Kauffman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original application by Emma Kauffman to be admitted to bail.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

Having been held to answer the charge of murder and committed to the custody of the sheriff of Minnehaha county the defendant applies for an order admitting her to bail.

The Constitution of this state secures to every one accused of crime the right to bail in all cases except when charged with a capital offense and even then, unless the proof of guilt is evident or the presumption of it is great. It declares: “All persons shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, except for capital offenses when proof is evident or presumption great.” Article 6, § 8. As said by Mr. Justice Field in construing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Tinder & SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KonigsbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. In Re Writ of Habeas Corpus of HumphreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. StahlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. In re HaiglerArizona Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API