Legal Opinion

CRISPINO v. PERFORMANCE FORD OF EAST HANOVER

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 19, 2025No. 2:24-cv-10847Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PETER CRISPINO, Case No. 2: 24-cv-10847 Plaintiff, Vv. OPINION ON MOTION TO REMAND PERFORMANCE FORD OF EAST HANOVER, LLC; FORD MOTOR CO, Defendants. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.: I. BACKGROUND This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant Performance Ford of East Hanover’s (“Performance”) notice of removal from the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, Morris County. ECF No. 1. The case concerns the purchase and sale of an allegedly defective vehicle, Plaintiff allegedly paid Performance $32,035.00 for a used 2018…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Usx Corporation v. Adriatic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Donahue v. Bill Page Toyota, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API