Hikes v. Crawford & Long
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 5 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL EK0M JEEEEBSON COUKT 03? COMMON PLEAS. CITED— 3 Metcalfe, 500 ; Bums vs. Anderson. 1 Metcalfe, 253 ; Hoskins vs. Parsons. 3 B. Mon., 8; Burrus 4* McConnoughy vs. Parrish. 2 B. Monroe, 303 ; Kouns vs. Bank of Kentucky. 8 Dana, 68; Buford vs. Francisco. Sess.
Read the full summary
CASE 5 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL EK0M JEEEEBSON COUKT 03? COMMON PLEAS. CITED— 3 Metcalfe, 500 ; Bums vs. Anderson. 1 Metcalfe, 253 ; Hoskins vs. Parsons. 3 B. Mon., 8; Burrus 4* McConnoughy vs. Parrish. 2 B. Monroe, 303 ; Kouns vs. Bank of Kentucky. 8 Dana, 68; Buford vs. Francisco. Sess. Acts, 1867, page 35. CITED— 21 How., 97; 19 How., 233; 26 Barb., '614. 10 Abb., 478; 13 Abb., 268; 1 Bos., 570. 12 Barb., 215; 4 Duer, 261; 6 Bosw., 66, 154. 3 B. Mon., 8; 1 Mon., 90, 249; 1 Met., 251. 6 Mon., 190; 4 B. Mon., 305 ; 2 B. Mon., 303. 1 Bush, 474 ; Joyce vs. Joyce's adm'r. 16 B. Mon., 351;…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion op the court:
Crawford and Long formed a1 copartnership, for the purpose of carrying on the dairy business. Long contracted a debt with Mrs. Fisher for borrowed money and the hire of a negro man, and gave a note therefor, with appellant as his surety. The services of the slave were devoted exclusively to the business of the firm, and the money borrowed was all applied in the same way, and was borrowed for that purpose. Long, however, signed his individual name to the note, and he and Hikes were sued upon it. The action was discontinued as to him, and judgment…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Carter v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- National Exchange Bank v. Wilgus' Ex'orsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Smith v. National Surety CoNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- Macklin's Ex'r v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
- Bacon, McClardy & Co. v. Hutchings, Duncan & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.