White v. Thompson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of nonsuit and dismissal.
Prom the bill of exceptions the following facts appear: The defendants, copartners, on or about June 20,1915, ordered from the Santa Cruz Portland Cement Company a carload of cement of the value of $820.70, which is the subject matter of the action, and agreed to pay for the same within a reasonable time after it was delivered to them. The Cement Company shipped the cement to the defendants at Visalia, as the consignees. On the 28th of June of the same year defendants wrote to the Cement Company, stating that they had delivered the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Sage v. HawleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Harman & Crockett v. Maddy Bros.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Carpenter v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vaughan v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Kinkle v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Store of Happiness v. Carmona & Allen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- California Milling Corp. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Cudd v. CowleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.