In Re Malualani B. Hoopiiaina Trusts
Court of Appeals of Utah
1DissentJackson, Judge
¶ 28 I concur in part and dissent in part.
I. TRUSTEE’S BREACH OF TRUST
¶ 29 The main opinion concludes that Malu “could not transfer the property in the trusts, as a trustee, other than as directed in the trusts.” This evades the well-established principle that a trustee can breach the trust, thereby triggering the statute of limitations. See 90 C.J.S. Trusts § 125 (2002) (“The trust relationship may continue until it is terminated by a repudiation by the trustee.... ”); 76 Am.Jur.2d Trusts § 654 (2005) (stating that the statute of limitations is tolled only “until the trustee openly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hammond v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bair v. Axiom Design, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- American Tierra Corp. v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.