Manor v. Hindman
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Shenandoah county, in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.
The controlling facts of this case (omitting many matters of detail which appear to us to be inconsequential) are: That C. C. Hindman, trading as C. C. Hindman & Co., of Greenville, S. C., bought of the Harrisonburg Milling Company,'a partnership composed of J. D.' Manor, Blanch B. Manor, Marguerite L. Haywood and Shirley M. Sebrell, *770who owned a flour mill at which they manufactured and sold large quantities of flour, eighteen hundred barrels of flour in October and November, 1914, for November and December delivery. The negotiations and sales, evidenced by telegrams and letters, show that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Street v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Goode v. BryantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
- Jackson v. Haynie's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Diamond State Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Tyler v. TeterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Remine v. WhitedSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Bryan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Culpepper v. RobieSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Margiotta v. AycockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.