Legal Opinion
Christian Antonelli v. Unknown Telemarketing Entity A; Unknown Telemarketing Entity B; Unknown Telemarketing Entity C; Unknown Telemarketing Entity D; Unknown Telemarketing Entity E; John Does 1-100
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 12, 2026No. 1:26-cv-03454Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTIAN ANTONELLI, Plaintiff, -against- UNKNOWN TELEMARKETING ENTITY A; 26-CV-3454 (AS) UNKNOWN TELEMARKETING ENTITY B; ORDER UNKNOWN TELEMARKETING ENTITY C; UNKNOWN TELEMARKETING ENTITY D; UNKNOWN TELEMARKETING ENTITY E; JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants. ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Truth in Caller ID Act, and New York law, alleging that unidentified telemarketing entities have unlawfully bombarded him with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Semitool, Inc. v. Tokyo Electron America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ayyash v. Bank Al-MadinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Rotten Records, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.