Legal Opinion

Ismail v. Singh

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Francois A. Rivera, J.

Defendant Singh moves for an order compelling codefendant, David Pelligrino, to appear for a deposition, or alternatively, for an order pursuant to CPLR 3126 (2), precluding codefendant, David Pelligrino, from testifying at trial. Codefendant, David Pelligrino, opposes the motion and cross-moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 and 3212 and Correction Law § 24 on the grounds that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint. Defendant Singh opposes codefendant’s cross motion. Plaintiff partially supports defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. DietzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. LibertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plair v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Ismail v. SinghNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API