Legal Opinion
Muro v. Target Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 31, 2009No. 08-1256PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
After receiving an unsolicited Target Visa card in the mail, Christine Muro brought this action, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, against Target Corporation, Target National Bank and Target Receivables Corporation (collectively “Target”). Ms. Muro alleged that Target had violated sections 127 and 132 of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1637(a) & (c), 1642. 1 The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Target and denied Ms. Muro’s motion for class certification of her TILA claims. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- CE Design Ltd. v. King Architectural Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Stockwell v. City of HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Sdahrie Howard v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Rhodes v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Buonomo v. Optimum Outcomes, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.