Hamre v. Resnick
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the lower court sustaining appellee Farnan’s and FSI Financial Group’s preliminary objections and dismissing appellants’ complaint on the basis of lack of venue.1 Our review of the record persuades us that it is deficient and compels us to remand for further proceedings on the authority of Pa.R.C.P. 1028(c).2
This case was initiated by the filing of a complaint in assumpsit on April 2, 1982. Appellants alleged that FSI Financial Group, Inc., breached its obligation to pay a debt at maturity in the amount of $42,333.00 plus interest. Jean…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re D.L.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Alumbaugh v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Luria v. LURIASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Wimble v. Parx Casino & Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hamre v. ResnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mazzuca, J. v. Abreu, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.