United States v. Berdeal
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part Motion to Dismiss Counts of Indictment
ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment [D.E. 49] is granted in part. Counts 2, 3, and 4 of the indictment against Carlos German Berdeal, Lilliam Pastrana Ber-deal, Rodolfo Julio Regó, and Carlos Seafood, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. Similarly, the conspiracy charges in Count 1 are dismissed with prejudice to the extent that they are based on alleged violations of § 68B-21.003(1) and § 68B-21.004(l)(a) of the Florida Administrative Code. 1
I. Allegations in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelly v. Palmer, Reifler, & Associates, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010