Legal Opinion

United States v. Berdeal

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 22, 2009No. Case 07-20898-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order Granting in Part Motion to Dismiss Counts of Indictment

ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge.

For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment [D.E. 49] is granted in part. Counts 2, 3, and 4 of the indictment against Carlos German Berdeal, Lilliam Pastrana Ber-deal, Rodolfo Julio Regó, and Carlos Seafood, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. Similarly, the conspiracy charges in Count 1 are dismissed with prejudice to the extent that they are based on alleged violations of § 68B-21.003(1) and § 68B-21.004(l)(a) of the Florida Administrative Code. 1

I. Allegations in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. Palmer, Reifler, & Associates, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API