Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Herring

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1937No. 6 Div. 84Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

FOSTER, Justice.

We wish to make it clear that we did not say that plea 6 was defective because it was a partial defense. Of course, a plea cari set up a partial defense by confession and avoidance to that extent. If it purports to be a defense in bar of the entire action, and its substance is such that it is in fact only partial, it is subject to demurrer, and our cases so hold. 16 Alabama Digest 81, Pleading, ^ 80. Plea 6 asserted certain facts relating to a certain class of articles, and asserted that plaintiff should not recover for such articles. It did not therefore purport…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. Grabfelder & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Frederick v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API