Legal Opinion

Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Min. & Mill. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1909No. 1,574PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United Stales for the District of Montana.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

A controversy arose in the year 1884 between the owners of the St. Louis lode claim and the Nine Hour lode claim, in the state of Montana, concerning a disputed boundary between the two claims. The controversy involved the possession and ownership of a strip of ground 30 feet wide, and including an area of about 12,844- square feet. At the time of applying for a patent the locators of the St. Louis claim included in their survey a portion of the ground claimed by the owners of the Nine Hour claim. The latter made an adverse claim, and brought an action to determine the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Reubens v. . JoelNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Morey v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Min. & Mill Co. of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  2. First Nat. Bank of Anadarko v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API