Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This was a writ of error to the District Court for the City and county of Philadelphia, in which bills of exceptions to the opinion of the court on points of evidence, and to the charge of the court, were returned with the record. The case was a feigned issue, directed by that court to try the right of Thomas Bradford to certain moneys arising from a sheriff’s sale of real estate, by virtue of a levari facias.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sergeant J.

[Who after stating the principal facts of the case, proceeded as follows.] — 1. On the trial of this cause in the court below, the defendants Harbert and Caldwell offered in evidence a deposition of Thomas T. Stiles, which had been taken on behalf of the plaintiff and read by him on the argument of the rule to shew cause why the feigned issue should not be directed, to try the plaintiff’s right to the money. But it was rejected, because Thomas T. Stiles was then in court, and could be called by the defendants as a witness. It is now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Gurney's Exrs. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cochran v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  2. Lanza v. LeGrand Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Westmoreland Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'n v. ConnorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Lauman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  5. Haupt v. HenningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API