Legal Opinion

W.J. S.S.R.R. Co. v. Cape May County

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 19, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The only question remaining for determination is to ascertain the amount due, if any, to the several defendants.

First — Joseph Camp. It will be noted that the answer filed by consent in this matter was not signed by the solicitor, nor is the mechanics' lien claim or affidavit thereto signed by anyone. It is needless, however, to consider any technical objection to this answer and claim, as the entire claim, with the exception of one item, is for the rental of a barge alleged to be used in this contract. The remaining item is for the value of a hawser which was upon the barge when rented, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Delaware River Quarry & Construction Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  2. Lake Pochung Outing Ass'n v. CurrentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chesebro-Whitman Co., Inc. v. EDENBORO APTS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Leonard D. Sylvester v. Giovannone C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Gallena-PooleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API