Legal Opinion

Lawson v. . Bachman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This action was upon a contract, by which defendant agreed to pay plaintiffs for services in collecting, in “ practicable time,” a claim for loss of property on board a ship destroyed by the rebel cruiser “ Florida,” a certain percentage on the amount collected. Defendants gave plaintiffs á power of attorney to prosecute and collect the claim.

Read the full summary

This action was upon a contract, by which defendant agreed to pay plaintiffs for services in collecting, in “ practicable time,” a claim for loss of property on board a ship destroyed by the rebel cruiser “ Florida,” a certain percentage on the amount collected. Defendants gave plaintiffs á power of attorney to prosecute and collect the claim. Plaintiffs alleged and gave evidence tending to show a performance in part, by preparing the necessary papers and filing claim with the State department, a willingness to wholly perform, and a prevention by defendants of further performance; they having…

1Opinion of the Court

Folgeb, Ch. J., reads for reversal of order of General Term and for affirmance of judgment on verdict.

All concur.

Order reversed and judgment affirmed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bachman v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Disputed Claim of Grapel v. HodgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Borden v. IsherwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. In re Albers Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Geo. J. Stadler Brewing Co. v. WeadleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API