Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Beall

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 15, 1856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charles county. This appeal was taken from a judgment of condemnation, rendered by the court below, (Crain, J.,) in an attachment case. The pleadings and facts of the case as they appear in the record are fully stated in the opinion of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtLe Grand, C. J.

The judgment in this case must be affirmed. The record *128does not exhibit, in any particular, any reason for reversal. The facts as shown are as follows: — At July term 1849, Samuel H. Beall, surviving obligee of Beall and Hodges, recovered a judgment in- the county court of Charles county against Daniel Jenifer for $212.06, interest and costs. On the 5th day of February 1852, Beall sued out an attachment upon this judgment; on the 16th of February, being the first day of the term of the circuit court, the sheriff, A. D. Smoot, made return of the writ, that he had “attached the rights and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baltimore Base Ball Club & Exhibition Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  2. Gill v. Physicians & Surgeons BuildingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Hughes v. SvbodaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API