Davis v. Hannon
Oregon Supreme Court
From Baker: Robert Eakin, Judge. Action to recover the possession of certain personal property. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion. Defendant prevailed, and from a judgment against him plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is an action by C. C. Davis to recover the value of personal property seized and sold upon execution. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant Hannon is the duly elected, qualified, and acting constable of Huntington Precinct in Baker County, and that the defendants Degel and Fifer are sureties on his official undertaking; that a judgment having been duly rendered in the justice’s court of said precinct in favor of one W. J. Woods, and against R. D. Gorby and W. M. Gorby, partners as Gorby Brothers, *193an execution was issued thereon, in pursuance of which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baldock v. AtwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Garrison v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Henderson v. MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Foster v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bramwell v. RowlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Doyle v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Nunn v. BirdOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Lieuallen v. MosgroveOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Roskop v. TrentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.