Legal Opinion
Murray v. Nantasket Beach Steamboat Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 29, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries, received by the plaintiff and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The case was tried before a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendant rested and duly made a motion for a directed verdict in its favor. The motion was denied and the defendant duly excepted. The evidence was then submitted to the jury and a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff. Before the verdict was recorded, the trial judge, with the assent of the jury, reserved leave to enter a verdict for the defendant under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rooney v. Sewall & Day Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Crimmins v. BoothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- McCafferty v. Lewando's French Dyeing & Cleansing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Sullivan v. New Bedford Gas & Edison Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Smith v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walker v. Benz Kid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Hannon v. Hayes-Bickford Lunch System, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Favereau v. GabeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Keough v. E. M. Loew's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Demaris v. Van LeeuwenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.