Wilson v. Cather
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 155, Jan. T., 1905, by defendant, from decree of O. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1904, No. 5032, on bill in equity in case of James Paul Wilson and Oscar W. Wilson v. Bertha E. Cather et al. Bill in equity for an injunction to compel the removal of obstructions to an alley.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 155, Jan. T., 1905, by defendant, from decree of O. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1904, No. 5032, on bill in equity in case of James Paul Wilson and Oscar W. Wilson v. Bertha E. Cather et al. Bill in equity for an injunction to compel the removal of obstructions to an alley. From the record it appeared that' plaintiffs owned the premises 4207 Frankford avenue in the city of Philadelphia, and that the defendants owned the adjoining property 4205 Frank-ford avenue. In 1800 the common owner of the two lots conveyed plaintiff’s lot “ with the privilege of an alley, or passage of ten…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The decree is affirmed on the opinions of the court below, overruling the demurrer, and on the final hearing.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Heffley v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Krocker v. Westmoreland Planing Mill Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Overly v. HixsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Onorato v. CarliniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.