Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Porter

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 1, 2019No. 18-3268PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

The law is well established that a defendant cannot relitigate the denial of a motion to suppress evidence after he enters a valid, unconditional guilty plea. Appellant Walter Porter entered such a plea. But he asks us to overturn the District Court's order denying his motion to suppress because he never intentionally relinquished ( i.e. , waived) his appellate rights, and the Court commented on those rights at sentencing. We hold that whether Porter waived his suppression claim is immaterial, and that the Court's statements did not expand Porter's appellate rights. We…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BUCKINGHAM v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  2. DICKERSON v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  3. Eddie Williams v. Superintendent Greene SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  4. SERRANO-MUNOZ v. ROGERSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. United States v. Glenn FordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API