Legal Opinion

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 1991No. 90-297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender. No court reporter was present during sentencing, however, the proceedings were recorded by audio tape recorder. The tape has been lost. Counsel and the trial court have been unable to prepare an adequate statement of the sentencing proceedings. See Fla.R.App.P. *7239.200(b)(4). The appellee has filed an answer brief agreeing with appellant’s position that under such circumstances appellant’s sentence should be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing appellant. We agree.

Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is hereby vacated and this case is…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ariko v. NicholsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API