Legal Opinion
In re Chris C. Yum
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 2018No. 16-BG-838PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
On May 12, 2011, petitioner Christopher C. Yum was disbarred by consent following his 2006 conviction for making a false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 1001. In re Yum , 19 A.3d 367 (D.C. 2011) (per curiam). On June 14, 2015, he filed a petition for reinstatement, which Disciplinary Counsel opposed. The parties appeared before an Ad Hoc Hearing Committee ("Hearing Committee"), which recommended reinstatement. Disciplinary Counsel took exception to the recommendation, and brought the matter before this court. Following oral argument, we referred the matter to the Board on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re BordersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re StantonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re SaboDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Karen P. Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re AgwumezieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re AlamgirDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re JosephDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.