Legal Opinion
In Re United Equipment, Inc., Debtor. Concord Commercial Corporation v. U.S. National Bank of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 1994No. 93-35191Published
1Opinion of the Court
37 F.3d 1506
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re UNITED EQUIPMENT, INC., Debtor.
CONCORD COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
U.S. NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON, Appellee.
No. 93-35191.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 13, 1994.*
Decided Sept. 19, 1994.
Before: ALDISERT,** NORRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM***
2
The question for decision in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fliegel v. Associates Capital Co. of Delaware, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Tom Boudreau and Mary Belle Boudreau, Husband and Wife v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Jarrett v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- CIA. Estrella Blanca, LTDA. v. S.S. NICTRICDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1965
- Butts v. Bendix Forest Products Corp. (In Re Summit Creek Plywood Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.