Securities & Exchange Commission v. Securities Northwest, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentEly, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. In my opinion, Lonergan, because of his status as a stockholder of Securities Northwest, Inc. [the Debtor], possesses the statutory right to be heard in proceedings brought under the Securities Investor Protection Act [SIPA], 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa-78111 (1976). I would therefore hold that Lonergan, without doubt, has the requisite standing. After reviewing the merits of his claim, however, I conclude that the decision of the District Court denying relief to Lonergan should be affirmed.
*627I. STANDING
I agree with my Brother Koelsch that Lonergan does not have a sufficiently…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,878 Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Charisma Securities Corporation, Edwin L. Gasperini, Gasperini & SavageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Aberdeen Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Willard L. Gleeson and Mary F. Gleeson v. Fred E. Carr, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Broadcasting Corporation of America, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Wonderbowl, Inc. v. JonasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.