Legal Opinion

Koeleg v. Phelps

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Simpson, J., presiding.) Replevin. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of replevin. The plaintiffs, April 30, 1887, rented of the defendant Phelps a farm, situated in the township of Maple Ridge, county of Alpena, for the term of three years from May 1, 1887. The contract was in writing, and of considerable length. Phelps was to furnish one-half of the seed, and the farming tools and utensils then on the place, and the use of *467•a team during the summer season. The plaintiffs were to do the work in a good and workman-like manner at all times, and give time and attention thereto, and furnish one-half the seed. The crops were to be divided…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hough v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Depew v. KetchumNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API