Legal Opinion

United States v. Laughlin

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided April 23, 2013No. 12-cr-30081Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.

The Defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of Sentencing Recommendation is denied for the following reasons.

I

The Defendant’s Motion raises issues related to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 and the disclosure of (1) the probation officer’s sentencing recommendation, and (2) the probation officer’s rationale for making such a recommendation.

In the middle of the twentieth century, probation officers prepared presentence investigation reports (PSRs), but disclosure of the PSR to the parties was limited, and varied across districts. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 32,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ollie PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Anthony PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API