United States v. Laughlin
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
The Defendant’s Motion for Disclosure of Sentencing Recommendation is denied for the following reasons.
I
The Defendant’s Motion raises issues related to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 and the disclosure of (1) the probation officer’s sentencing recommendation, and (2) the probation officer’s rationale for making such a recommendation.
In the middle of the twentieth century, probation officers prepared presentence investigation reports (PSRs), but disclosure of the PSR to the parties was limited, and varied across districts. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 32,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Ollie PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Anthony PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011