Vanderhorst v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DICKENSON, Justice.
After the jury convicted John Todd Van-derhorst of “Bail Jumping and Failure to Appear," 1 he entered a plea of "true” to the enhancement allegation, 2 and the jury assessed his punishment at eleven years confinement. We affirm.
Sufficiency of Evidence
In his first point of error, appellant argues the evidence is insufficient to establish that his failure to appear for arraignment on January 29 was intentional or knowing. Section 38.11 provides:(a) A person lawfully released from custody, with or without bail, on condition that he subsequently appear commits an offense…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Euziere v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Pyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
3Cited by16 opinions
- Russo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- State of Maine v. David W. TroySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Etchison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- Ashley Charles Burrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
- Bobby J. Whetstone, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.