Legal Opinion

Berger v. Herbert

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to vacate an order for the examination of the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Gtiegebicb:, J.

The defendant moves .to vacate an order for his examination in an action to recover $50,-000 damages for an alleged breach of promise of marriage. The answer is substantially a general denial, and a general release before the commence-' ment of the action is also pleaded as a separate *361and distinct defense.' It was held in Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 1, 144 App. Div. 587, where a parent brought suit to recover $100,000 damages for the alleged seduction of a minor daughter, and in Wessel v. Schwarzler, No. 2, 144 id. 589, which was brought by such daughter to recover $100>,000…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wessel v. SchwarzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Kornbluth v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finley v. Factory, Etc., Ins. Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Independent Dairy Workers Union of Hightstown v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 680Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API