Strauss-Pritz Co. v. Axson
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District. Action by the Strauss-Pritz Company against Frank J. Axso-n. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the pleadings, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtWeeks, J.
The complaint herein alleges that the plaintiff is a foreign corporation created under the laws of the state of Ohio, and that in November, 1914, and February and May, 1915, “in the state of Ohio, it sold and delivered to defendant goods, etc., amounting to $248.50.” The defendant by answer admits the sale and delivery of the goods and their value, but denies that part of the complaint which avers that the goods were sold “in the state of Ohio.” It then sets up as a defense that the plaintiff has not procured the necessary license ' to' authorize it to do business in this state.
[1,2] I think…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Schratwieser Fireproof Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911