Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Armentero

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1986No. Docket 78594Published

1DissentM. J. Kelly, J.

I dissent.

I agree that a defendant’s testimony from a prior trial may generally be admitted at a subsequent trial for the same offense on the theory that once defendant has voluntarily waived his or her privilege against self-incrimination that waiver cannot be revoked in future proceedings in the same case. Harrison v United States, 392 US 219, 222; 88 S Ct 2008; 20 L Ed 2d 1047 (1968). The exception to this rule, as announced in Harrison, occurs where a defendant’s testimony at the earlier proceeding was prompted or impelled by illegal evidence. Id. In determining whether testimony from a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. GardnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API