Legal Opinion

Price v. Sorrell

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1989No. 89-12Published

1Opinion of the Court

784 P.2d 614 (1989)

Daniel L. PRICE, Jr., d/b/a Mountain States Adjustment, Appellant (Plaintiff),

v.

Larry D. SORRELL and Hazel Hatcher, Appellees (Defendants).

No. 89-12.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

December 28, 1989.

Patrick M. Hunter, Casper, for appellant.

Larry Sorrell, pro se.

Before CARDINE, C.J., and THOMAS, URBIGKIT, MACY and GOLDEN, JJ.

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Daniel L. Price, Jr., d/b/a Mountain States Adjustment (Price), a collection agency, sued Attorney Larry D. Sorrell, appellee, to recover damages for intentional interference with performance of its contract with Riverton…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Commission of West HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API