Legal Opinion
Bascom v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 12, 1986No. 85-914PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
This appeal is before us because the district court sustained, for lack of personal jurisdiction, the special appearance of the defendants Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company (Schlitz) and Stroh Brewery Company (Stroh), two foreign corporations. See Iowa R.Civ.P. 66. The plaintiffs, Kenneth Bascom and Kay Bascom, have appealed from the district court’s order sustaining the special appearance. The defendants cross-appealed because the district court failed to dismiss the plaintiffs’ suit on the basis of issue preclusion. Because we affirm the order of the district court on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Israel v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Violet v. PicilloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- Dr. I. H. Rubaii, D/B/A Technical Consultant Services v. Lakewood Pipe of Texas, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Mib, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Soults Farms, Inc. v. Charles J. Schafer v. Soults Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Sabek, Inc. v. Engelhard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Bond v. Cedar Rapids Television Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Buckingham v. Federal Land Bank Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Burns v. BOARD OF NURSING OF IOWASupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.