Xcel Energy Serv., Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCane, J.
¶ 1. We are again presented with a dispute concerning the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 102.23(l)(a), which requires that a party aggrieved by a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission name all adverse parties as defendants when seeking circuit court review.1 The Commission maintains that Xcel Energy Services, Inc.'s complaint must be dismissed on the ground that Xcel failed to name its worker's compensation insurance carrier as a party. We conclude that Miller Brewing Co. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission, 166 Wis. 2d 830, 480 N.W.2d 532 (Ct. App. 1992), aff'd 173 Wis. 2d 700, 495…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Liberty Trucking Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Miller Brewing Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013