Legal Opinion

Benningfield ex rel. Benningfield v. Zinsmeister

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2012No. 2009-SC-000660-DGPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice NOBLE.

Under Kentucky’s dog-bite liability statutes, KRS 258.095 and .235, the owner of a dog is strictly liable for damages caused by the dog. This case presents the questions whether a landlord can be liable under the statutory scheme’s broad definition of “owner” and whether that liability can extend to injuries caused by a tenant’s dog off the leased premises. We hold that a landlord can be the owner of a tenant’s dog for the purposes of liability under certain circumstances, but that any such liability extends only to injuries caused on or immediately…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cowan v. WilkinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rye v. WeaselKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hughes v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. University of Louisville v. Rothstein, MarkKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Maupin v. TankersleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Carney v. GaltCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  4. Anna Insko v. Jeremiah PerrautCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
  5. Anthony Sigler v. Jasmine CurtisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API