Legal Opinion

Gale v. Gale

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1953No. 7944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

The legal principle controlling in this case is that a divorce decree may not be modified unless it is alleged, proved and the trial court finds that the circumstances upon which it was based have undergone a substantial change.1

The plaintiff was awarded a decree of divorce May 29, 1951. A property settlement was approved which gave her the family home (being purchased under contract), certain personal property and the custody of four minor children *279for whose support the defendant was required to pay $25 per month each, totaling $100. .

Eighteen months later, plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chaffee v. ChaffeeUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Osmus v. OsmusUtah Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kallas v. KallasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Klein v. KleinUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Anderson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API