Gale v. Gale
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
The legal principle controlling in this case is that a divorce decree may not be modified unless it is alleged, proved and the trial court finds that the circumstances upon which it was based have undergone a substantial change.1
The plaintiff was awarded a decree of divorce May 29, 1951. A property settlement was approved which gave her the family home (being purchased under contract), certain personal property and the custody of four minor children *279for whose support the defendant was required to pay $25 per month each, totaling $100. .
Eighteen months later, plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chaffee v. ChaffeeUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Osmus v. OsmusUtah Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kallas v. KallasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Klein v. KleinUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Anderson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- Christensen v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.