Legal Opinion

Riley v. Industrial Life & Health Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1940No. 13416PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. Under the rule in this State, a provision in a life-insurance policy that it shall be incontestable after specified 3rears from its date, except as to certain conditions as to premiums, is valid; the insurer is, with the exception indicated, precluded from setting up any defense based upon misrepresentations or warxanties made by the insured in his application, whether fraudulent or otherwise; and under a proper interpretation of the policy, such a clause manifests the intention of the parties that all grounds of defense, save non-payment of premium, shall be cut off by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Northwestern Life Insurance v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Missouri State Life Insurance v. CranfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance v. WoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
  2. National Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ShallowayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. National Life & Casualty Insurance v. BlankenbillerArizona Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API