Riley v. Industrial Life & Health Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. Under the rule in this State, a provision in a life-insurance policy that it shall be incontestable after specified 3rears from its date, except as to certain conditions as to premiums, is valid; the insurer is, with the exception indicated, precluded from setting up any defense based upon misrepresentations or warxanties made by the insured in his application, whether fraudulent or otherwise; and under a proper interpretation of the policy, such a clause manifests the intention of the parties that all grounds of defense, save non-payment of premium, shall be cut off by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- American Life Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Northwestern Life Insurance v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. CranfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guarantee Trust Life Insurance v. WoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- National Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ShallowayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- National Life & Casualty Insurance v. BlankenbillerArizona Supreme Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.