Stoddard v. Nelson
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah County.
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.
This is an action brought to abate a nuisance, and to recover damages for maintaining the same.
The amended complaint is substantially as follows: 1. That defendant is the owner of lot 8 in block 118 of the city of Portland; that plaintiff, as trustee, leased *418the front fifty-one feet of said lot of defendant, for a term, for rental value, and placed buildings upon it. Defendant thereafter, during the term, and without plaintiff’s consent, built á high board fence on the rear line of said leased property, which sensibly shut out light and air from plaintiff’s stores, and rendered the same…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. . DeenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Bast v. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Looney v. RankinOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Walker v. EnglerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tallmadge v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Portland National Bank v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Colvin v. GoffOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Gill v. Columbia Contract Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Leavitt & Co. v. DimmickOregon Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.